Science Education and Student Results in Spain: A Multivariate Approach
AUTHORS
Francisco López Rupérez,Cátedra de Políticas Educativas, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
Eva Expósito-Casas,Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain
Isabel García García,Cátedra de Políticas Educativas, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
ABSTRACT
Science education is considered one of the key elements for the development of skills and competencies for the economy and society of the 21st century. Beyond its economic dimension, the quality of science teaching in compulsory education has a fundamental civic dimension: in the new context, it is necessary to adopt scientific reasoning and approaches and be able to position it in the face of political proposals whose evaluation will quite often require future scientific knowledge. In this context, for the first time, PISA 2015 provides the results of all the Spanish autonomous communities on statistically representative samples at the regional level. This allows a territorialized diagnosis to be made on different aspects related to science education. In this work, we have identified a set of variables related to instruction whose influence on student performance in sciences has been significant. For this reason, a multiple linear regression model has been used. This model has first been applied to the national sample and then to the samples from the seventeen autonomous communities. Moreover, based on PISA 2015 data, a dependent variable of a dichotomous nature has been defined, centered on predicting if 15-year-old students will or will not have STEM professions at 30 years of age. An analysis of Multivariate Binary Logistic Regression has been carried out at both the national and autonomous community levels. The discussion of the results provides some reflections of interest for educational policies and teaching practices.
KEYWORDS
PISA 2015, Science education, Performance in sciences, STEM vocation, Educational policies, Teaching practices
REFERENCES
[1] K. Shwab, “Cuatro principios de liderazgo de la cuarta revolución industrial,” World Economic Forum, Available in www.weforum.org/es/agenda/2016/10/cuatro-principios-de-liderazgo-de-la-cuarta-revolucion-industrial, (2016)
[2] Fundación Telefónica, “Incrementar las vocaciones STEM entre los jóvenes,” Available in https://top100desafio.fundaciontelefonica.com/incrementar-las-vocaciones-stem-entre-los-jovenes, (2014)
[3] Council of the European Union, “Conclusiones del Consejo,” de 12 de mayo de 2009, sobre un marco estratégico para la cooperación europea en el ámbito de la educación y la formación (ET 2020), OJC 119, 28/5/2009, pp.2-10, (2009)
[4] D. Langdon and G. McKittrick, D. Beede, B. Khan, and M. Doms, “STEM: good jobs now and for the future,” Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington: the U.S., (2011)
[5] Royal Academy of Engineering, “Econometrics of engineering skills project,” Jobs and growth: the importance of engineering skills to the UK economy, Royal Academy of Engineering, London, Available in https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/jobs-and-growth, (2012)
[6] EU STEM Coalition, Available in http://www.stemcoalition.eu, (2015)
[7] CEDEFOP, “Skill shortage and surplus occupations in Europe,” European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Thessaloniki, Greece, (2016)
[8] WEF, “The future of jobs employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution,” World Economic Forum, Available in http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf, (2016)
[9] E. Reig Martínez, F. Pérez García, J. Quesada Ibáñez, I. Serrano Martínez, C. Albert Pérez, C. Benages Candau, J. Pérez Ballester, and J. Salamanca Gonzales, “La competitividad de las regiones españolas ante la Economía del Conocimiento,” IVIE-Fundación BBVA, Valencia, Available in https://www.fbbva.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Informe_final_Economia_Conocimiento.pdf, (2016)
[10] T.J. Kautz, J.J. Heckman, R. Diris, B. Weel, and L. Borghans, “Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success,” OECD Education Working Papers, no.110, OECD Publishing, Paris, (2014) DOI:10.1787/5jxsr7vr78f7-en
[11] J.M. Cavero Clerencia and D. Ruiz Quejido, “Educación para la innovación y el emprendimiento: Una educación para el futuro. Recomendaciones para su impulse,” Real Academia de Ingeniería, Madrid Available in http://www.raing.es/sites/default/files/EDUCACION_PARA_INNOVACION_Web.pdf, (2017)
[12] OECD, “PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools,” PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, (2016) DOI:10.1787/9789264267510-en
[13] European Commission, “Science education for responsible citizenship,” Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education. European Commission, Brussels, Available in https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf, (2015)
[14] J.M. Rodríguez-Mantilla, M.J. Fernández-Díaz, and G. Jover Olmeda, “PISA 2015: Predictores del rendimiento en ciencias en españa. revista de educación,” 380. Abril-junio 2018, pp.75-102, (2017) DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-373.
[15] J. Hattie, “Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?” Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, October 2003, pp.1-17, Available in https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=research_conference_2003, (2003)
[16] J. Hattie, “Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement,” Routledge, London, (2009)
[17] J. Hattie, “What works best in education: The politics of collaborative expertise,” Pearson, London, (2015)
[18] OECD, “PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematics, and financial literacy,” OECD Publishing, Paris, (2016) DOI:10.1787/9789264255425-en
[19] L. C. Silva Ayçaguer and I.M. Barroso Utra, “Regresión logística,” La Muralla, Madrid, (2004)
[20] OECD, “PISA 2015 results,” Excellence and equity in education, vol.I. OECD Publishing, Paris, Available in https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i_9789264266490-en, (2016)
[21] E. López López, “El mastery learning a la luz de la investigación educative,” Revista de Educación, 340, Mayo-agosto, pp.625-665, (2006)
[22] J. W. Thomas, “A review of research on project-based learning,” Supported by The Autodesk Foundation 111 McInnis Parkway San Rafael, California, Available in http://www.bie.org/index.php/site/RE/pbl_research/29, (2000)
[23] M. Mourshed, M. Krawitz, and E. Dorn, “How to improve student educational outcomes: New insights from data analytics,” Available in https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/how-to-improve-student- educational-outcomes-new-insights-from-data-analytics, (2017)
[24] L. J. Cronbach and R.E. Snow, “Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions,” Irvington, New York, Available in http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re340/re340_23.pdf
[25] F. López Rupérez, Más allá de las partículas y de las ondas, “Una propuesta de inspiración epistemológica para la educación científica,” Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid, Available in https://es.scribd.com/document/238691032/Lopez-Ruperez-Mas-Alla-de-Las-Particulas-y-Las-Ondas
[26] J. B. Carroll, “Human cognitive abilities,” Cambridge University Press, New York
[27] National Research Council, “Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century,” Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, (2012)
[28] F. López Rupérez, I. García García, and E. Expósito-Casas, “Performance in science, epistemic conceptions, and STEM vocations in Spain’s autonomous communities: Evidence from PISA 2015, improvement policies,
[29] F. López Rupérez, E. Expósito-Casas, and I. García García, “Science education and gender gap in Spain,” Secondary analyses from PISA 2015 and recommendations for the improvement, Revista Bordón, (2019)