A Study on Cultural Studies and the Human Dimension in Contemporary Social Analysis
AUTHORS
Wei-Lun Chen,Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Mei-Hua Lin,College of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an examination of cultural studies with a focus on its relevance to the human dimension of contemporary social analysis. Cultural studies has developed as a field of inquiry that crosses disciplinary boundaries and seeks to understand the complex ways in which culture influences human thought, behavior, and interaction. The purpose of this study is to clarify how cultural studies contributes to an enriched understanding of social realities by directing attention to everyday practices, symbolic meanings, and the processes through which identity and community are formed. The scope of the paper includes a consideration of the conceptual orientations of cultural studies, the methodological approaches commonly applied in its practice, and the thematic areas in which its insights are most significant. In particular, attention is given to questions of identity and representation, to the transformations of culture under conditions of globalization, to the role of media and popular culture in shaping perception, and to the dynamics of power and resistance within social life. By examining these themes, the study highlights the potential of cultural studies to illuminate both the stability and the fluidity of cultural forms and to reveal how social meaning is continuously negotiated. The analysis suggests that cultural studies, while marked by diversity and openness in its approaches, are unified by its emphasis on human experience and its concern for the cultural basis of social relations. In conclusion, the paper argues that cultural studies offers valuable perspectives for the analysis of contemporary society, strengthens the human dimension within the social sciences, and provides a foundation for further inquiry into the evolving relationship between culture and human life.
KEYWORDS
Cultural studies, Human dimension, Social analysis, Identity and representation, Globalization, Interdisciplinary framework
REFERENCES
[1] T. Bennett, “Cultural Studies and the Culture Concept,” Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 546–568, (2015). DOI:10.1080/09502386.2014.1000605(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[2] T. Striphas, “Caring for Cultural Studies,” Cultural Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–18, (2018). DOI:10.1080/09502386.2018.1543716 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[3] B. Green and A. Hickey, “Cultural Studies and education: a dialogue of ‘disciplines’?,” Continuum, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 631–643, (2022). DOI:10.1080/10304312.2022.2083583(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[4] A. Alsaleh, “The impact of technological advancement on culture and society,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, article 32140, (2024). DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83995-z (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[5] L. Yates, “How everyday life matters: everyday politics, everyday consumption and social change,” Consumption and Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 144–169, (2022). DOI:10.1332/MBPU6295 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[6] H. Jenkins, “Rethinking ‘Rethinking Convergence/Culture’,” Cultural Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 267–297, (2013). DOI:10.1080/09502386.2013.801579 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[7] G. Wang, “Globalization and hybridization in cultural products,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, (2005). DOI:10.1177/1367877905052416 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[8] M. Yao, “The study of the effects of digital media applications in cross-cultural communication in the construction of cultural identity,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 258, article 105247, (2025). DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105247 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[9] R. Ventura, “Building a Culture of Peace in Everyday Life With Inter- and Transdisciplinary Perspectives,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, article 847968, (2022). DOI:10.3389/feduc.2022.847968 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[10] J. A. and J. S. Cardinal, “The Behavior of Information: A Reconsideration of Social Norms,” Societies, vol. 13, no. 5, article 111, (2023). DOI:10.3390/soc13050111 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[11] K. Tomaselli and Y. Xiao, “Cultural Studies in Interhemispherical Perspective. China, Africa, Asia and Australasia,” Critical Arts, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1–24, (2023). DOI:10.1080/02560046.2023.2289315 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[12] T. Masuda, B. Batdorj, and S. Senzaki, “Culture and Attention: Future Directions to Expand Research beyond the Geographical Regions of WEIRD Cultures,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, article 490858, (2020). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01394 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[13] T. Bennett, Culture: A reformer's science, Sage Publications Ltd., (1998)
[14] S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, Sage Publications, Inc; Open University Press, (1997)
[15] R. Williams, Culture and Society, 1780–1950, New York: Columbia University Press
[16] J. Storey, Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction (8th ed.), Routledge, (2018). DOI:10.4324/9781315226866 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[17] W. W. Lewis, “The mediated construction of reality: by Nick Couldry and Andreas Hepp,” International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 213–215, (2020). DOI:10.1080/14794713.2020.1730071 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[18] M. Kraidy, Hybridity, or the Cultural Logic of Globalization, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, (2005)
[19] B. Anderson, “Affective atmospheres,” Emotion, Space and Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–81, (2009). DOI:10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[20] S. Ahmed and S. Ahmed, The Cultural Politics of Emotion: Tenth Anniversary Edition (1st ed.), Routledge, (2005). DOI:10.4324/9780203700372 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[21] K. Traynor, “YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture,” European Journal of Communication, (2020). DOI:10.1177/0267323120935319 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[22] D. Hesmondhalgh and S. Baker, Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries (1st ed.), Routledge, (2011). DOI:10.4324/9780203855881 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[23] M. F. Adilazuarda, S. Mukherjee, P. Lavania, S. Singh, A. F. Aji, A. Modi, and M. Choudhury, “Towards Measuring and Modeling ‘Culture’ in LLMs: A Survey,” ArXiv, (2024)
[24] E. Duester, “Digital Culture and Arts Communication via Facebook: Prospects and Concerns for Work in the Culture Sector in Vietnam,” Asiascape: Digital Asia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 233–255, (2023). DOI:10.1163/22142312-bja10052 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[25] J. Fang, “Globalizing the sociology of the arts and culture: East Asian perspectives,” The Journal of Chinese Sociology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, (2023). DOI:10.1186/s40711-023-00190-9 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[26] R. Fellows and A. Liu, “Sensemaking in the cross-cultural contexts of projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 246–257, (2016). DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.010 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[27] A. Pritchard and N. J. Morgan, “Culture, identity and tourism representation: Marketing Cymru or Wales?,” Tourism Management, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 167–179, (2001). DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00047-9 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[28] A. Flitton and T. E. Currie, “Assessing different historical pathways in the cultural evolution of economic development,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 71–82, (2021). DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.11.001(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[29] M. Kohout-Diaz, “Advancing an inclusive research approach in humanities and social sciences: The crucial role of self-study and narrative enquiry in doctoral research experiences,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 11, article 101256, (2024). DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101256 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[30] D. M. Ponton and T. V. Larina, “Discourse Analysis in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice (I),” Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 7–25, (2016). DOI:10.22363/2687-0088-15145(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[31] R. E. Lee, “Cultural studies, complexity studies and the transformation of the structures of knowledge,” International Journal of Cultural Studies, (2007). DOI:10.1177/1367877907073896 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[32] D. S. Arnault and L. Sinko, “Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives,” Global Qualitative Nursing Research, (2021). DOI:10.1177/23333936211020722 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[33] C. Li, “From traditional culture to modern communication: Historical evolution and value reconstruction mechanisms of heroic archetypes in news narratives,” Brill, (2025). Retrieved from https://brill-de.com/2025/07/09/from-traditional-culture-to-modern-communication-historical-evolution-and-value-reconstruction-mechanisms-of-heroic-archetypes-in-news-narratives/
[34] M. Ginzarly and J. Teller, “Leveraging social media for resilient cultural heritage: A people-centred conceptual framework for community engagement and crisis response,” Built Heritage, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, (2025). DOI:10.1186/s43238-025-00209-9 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[35] A. Arora, L. Kaffee, and I. Augenstein, “Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Values,” ArXiv, (2022)
[36] C. Li, D. Teney, L. Yang, Q. Wen, X. Xie, and J. Wang, “CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models,” ArXiv, (2024)
[37] B. H. Nam, Y. Yang, and R. Draeger, “Intercultural communication between Chinese college students and foreign teachers through the English corner at an elite language university in Shanghai,” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 93, article 101776, (2023). DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101776 (CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[38] T. Yu. Shelestova, A. N. Kalizhanova, and M. V. Bedelbayeva, “Personality-based intercultural awareness in undergraduate translation students via postcrossing,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 11, no. 1, (2024). DOI:10.1080/23311983.2024.2313839(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)