The Relationship between High School Physical Education Teacher's Guiding Behavior Type, Learning Attitude, and Learning Commitment

AUTHORS

Sung-jin Ko,Graduate Student, Department of Physical Education, Graduate School of Woosuk University, Jeonbuk, Korea
Hyun-chul Cho,Professor, Department of Physical Education, Woosuk University, Jeonbuk, Korea
Hyun-ryun Kim*,Researcher, Sports Welfare Convergence Research Institute,Woosuk University, Jeonbuk, Korea

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to empirically on investigate the relationship between learning attitude, learning commitment, and high school physical education teachers' instructional behavior patterns. To achieve this research objective, a population of 484 students enrolled in a male high school located in J City, Jeollabuk-do were selected by convenience sampling, excluding 72 questionnaires that were judged to have inadequate responses after sample collection. A total of 412 parts were used for the final result. The collected data processing was analyzed as follows using the statistical program SPSS Windows 21.0 Version by coding the finally selected facility. The data processing methods were frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability verification (Cronbach's α). Correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were conducted to analyze the impact relationship between each variable, and the research results according to the purpose of this study are as follows. First, as for the influence of teacher-guided behavior type on learning attitude, positive rewarding behavior, democratic behavior, and authoritative behavior among the sub-factors of teacher-guided behavior type were excluded from learning attitude, and social support behavior (β=.435, p. <.001), professor and instructional behavior (β=.203, p<.001) were found to have a positive effect. Second, the influence of teacher-guided behavior type on learning commitment was excluded because positive reward behavior and authoritative behavior were not significant among the sub-factors of teacher-led behavior type for learning commitment, and social support behavior (β=.435, p<. 001), teaching and instruction behavior (β=.203, p<.001), and were found to have a positive effect. Third, the influence of learning attitude type on learning commitment is autonomy (β=.365, p<.001), attention (β=.282, p<.001), interest (β=.258) for learning commitment p<.001).

 

KEYWORDS

Physical education teacher, Instructional behavior type, Learning attitude, Learning immersion

REFERENCES

[1] Y. H. Park, “A study on the physical education attitude of elementary school students,” Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education, (2004)
[2] I. Kang, “A survey of high school students' perceptions of physical education classes,” Unpublished master's thesis, Yongin University Graduate School of Education, (2001)
[3] H. Kim, “A study on the satisfaction of middle and high school students in physical education classes,” Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, (2003)
[4] S. G. Kim, “Problems and improvement measures of secondary physical education in national sports,” The Korean Sports Association, the 21st National Sports Promotion Seminar, (2002)
[4] S. G. Kim, “Problems and improvement measures of secondary physical education in national sports,” The Korean Sports Association, the 21st National Sports Promotion Seminar, (2002)
[6] D. E. Park “A study on the satisfaction of high school students in physical education classes,” Unpublished master's thesis, Hanyang University Graduate School of Education, (2005)
[7] C. Y. Jeon, “The relationship between the class guidance type of high school physical education teacher and the student's physical education class attitude,” Unpublished master's thesis, Sejong University Graduate School of Education, (2001)
[8] S. G. Kim, C. Y. Jeon, and G. H. Ga, “The relationship between high school physical education teacher's class instruction type and student's class attitude,” Journal of the Korean Physical Education Association, vol.38, no.4, pp.277-28, (2001)
[9] E. Hong, “Middle school students’ satisfaction with physical education classes according to physical education teacher's leadership behavior types,” Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Education, Korea National Sport University, (2006)

CITATION

  • APA:
    Ko,S.& Cho,H.& Kim*,H.(2021). The Relationship between High School Physical Education Teacher's Guiding Behavior Type, Learning Attitude, and Learning Commitment. Journal of Advanced Researches and Reports, 1(2), 149-160. 10.21742/JARR.2021.1.2.20
  • Harvard:
    Ko,S., Cho,H., Kim*,H.(2021). "The Relationship between High School Physical Education Teacher's Guiding Behavior Type, Learning Attitude, and Learning Commitment". Journal of Advanced Researches and Reports, 1(2), pp.149-160. doi:10.21742/JARR.2021.1.2.20
  • IEEE:
    [1] S.Ko, H.Cho, H.Kim*, "The Relationship between High School Physical Education Teacher's Guiding Behavior Type, Learning Attitude, and Learning Commitment". Journal of Advanced Researches and Reports, vol.1, no.2, pp.149-160, Apr. 2021
  • MLA:
    Ko Sung-jin, Cho Hyun-chul and Kim* Hyun-ryun. "The Relationship between High School Physical Education Teacher's Guiding Behavior Type, Learning Attitude, and Learning Commitment". Journal of Advanced Researches and Reports, vol.1, no.2, Apr. 2021, pp.149-160, doi:10.21742/JARR.2021.1.2.20

ISSUE INFO

  • Volume 1, No. 2, 2021
  • ISSN(p):0
  • ISSN(e):2653-0058
  • Published:Apr. 2021