The comparison research of the contact interval testing for the four different placing methods of Implant Fixture and Abutment

AUTHORS

Soo-chul Park,Department of Dental Technology, Gimcheon University, 214 Daehakro Gimcheon City, Gyeongbuk 740-704, KOREA
Jung-Hwa Lee,Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Nursing and Healthcare Sciences, Dong Eui University, 176 Eomgwangno Busan jingu, Busan City, 47340, KOREA

ABSTRACT

This study carried out contact interval tests for the purpose of evaluating differences of contact intervals between fixtures and abutments after fixing 4-kind implant (N=4) fixtures and abutments having different clamping methods. As a result of doing tests on 4-kind implant contact interval tests having different clamping methods, contact intervals between fixtures and abutments of Internal hexagon connection implant, and contact intervals between fixtures and abutments of Internal octagon connection implant were measured lowest.

 

KEYWORDS

Dental Implant, fixture to abutment joint, micro-gap, Implant systems

REFERENCES

[1]                    A. D. Sones, “Complications with osseo integrated implants”, J. Prosthet Dent. Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 581-585, (1989)
[2]                    E. A. Patterson, “Passive fit: Meaning, significance and assessment in relation to implant-supported prostheses. In: Naert EI. Passive fit of implant-supported superstructures: Friction or reality?” Proceedings of an international symposium. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 17-28 (1995)
[3]      E. S. Eckert, “Text book of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology”, 2nd ed. Korea, Daehan Narae Publishing Inc, Seoul (2006)
[4]      P. P. Binon, “Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments, and laboratory analogs”, International Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 162-178 (1995)
[5]      C.E. English, “Externally hexed implants, abutments, and transfer devices: a comprehensive overview”, Implant Dentistry. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 273-282 (1992)
[6]      U. Brägger, S. Aeschlimann, W. Bürgin, C.H. Hämmerle and N.P. Lang, “Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function”, Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 26-34, (2001)
[7]      S. C. Park, I. H. Jeong, and J.H. Kang, “The Study of Compression Shear Load of Implanting in Four Different Fastening Method”, International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 1-8, (2015)
[8]      A. P. Ricomini Filho, F. S. Fernandes, F. G. Straioto, W. J. da Silva and A.A. Del Bel Cury, “Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant abutment connection systems”, Brazilian Dental Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 123-129, (2010)

CITATION

  • APA:
    Park,S.& Lee,J.H.(2017). The comparison research of the contact interval testing for the four different placing methods of Implant Fixture and Abutment. International Journal of IT-based Public Health Management, 4(1), 7-12. 10.21742/IJIPHM.2017.4.1.02
  • Harvard:
    Park,S., Lee,J.H.(2017). "The comparison research of the contact interval testing for the four different placing methods of Implant Fixture and Abutment". International Journal of IT-based Public Health Management, 4(1), pp.7-12. doi:10.21742/IJIPHM.2017.4.1.02
  • IEEE:
    [1] S.Park, J.H.Lee, "The comparison research of the contact interval testing for the four different placing methods of Implant Fixture and Abutment". International Journal of IT-based Public Health Management, vol.4, no.1, pp.7-12, Jan. 2017
  • MLA:
    Park Soo-chul and Lee Jung-Hwa. "The comparison research of the contact interval testing for the four different placing methods of Implant Fixture and Abutment". International Journal of IT-based Public Health Management, vol.4, no.1, Jan. 2017, pp.7-12, doi:10.21742/IJIPHM.2017.4.1.02

ISSUE INFO

  • Volume 4, No. 1, 2017
  • ISSN(p):2205-8508
  • ISSN(e):2207-3965
  • Published:Jan. 2017

DOWNLOAD