Comparison of Power Consumption According to the Communication Protocol Mode of Fine-Dust IoT Device Based on oneM2M Standard Protocol
AUTHORS
Seong-Se Cho,Dept. of Aeronautical Systems Engineering Hanseo University, 236-49, Gomseom-ro, Nam-myeon, Taean-gun, 32158 Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
Seung-Hun Kim,Dept. of Aeronautical Systems Engineering Hanseo University, 236-49, Gomseom-ro, Nam-myeon, Taean-gun, 32158 Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
Won-Hyuck Choi,Department of Avionics Engineering Hanseo University, 236-49, Gomseom-ro, Nam-myeon, Taean-gun, 32158 Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
ABSTRACT
As all things are connected to the Internet, the Internet of Things has become possible through communication without user intervention, and the Internet of Things has recently focused on various areas such as smart homes, smart cars, smart factories, and industrial sites. In the HTTP communication protocol environment, we established a system to communicate between client servers using the communication protocols MQTT and CoAP communication protocols together with the fine dust sensor and confirmed the amount of power generated according to the message transmission mode used for each communication.
KEYWORDS
OneM2M, MQTT, CoAP, Standard protocol, Fine dust, IoT
REFERENCES
[1] M. Prihodko, “Energy consumption in location sharing protocols for Android applications,” M.S. thesis, Linköopings University, (2012)
[2] J. S. Myeong, “IoT service platform standardization status,” TTA Journal, (2016)
[3] S. Y. Kim and K.Y. Kim, “Standardization of IoT service platform,” vol.6, no.32, (2014)
[4] oneM2M, oneM2M Service Layer Protocol Core Specification, (2014)
[5] Milan Tucic, “Networking layer for unifying distributed smart home entities,” 22nd telecommunications forum telFOR, November 25-27, Belgrade, Serbia, (2014)
[6] M. Dong, T. Lan, and L. Zhong, “Rethink energy accounting with cooperative game theory,” MobiCom 14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, September pp.531-542, New York, United States, (2014)
[7] H. S. Kim, S. Kumar, and D. E. Culler, “Thread/Open thread: A compromise in low-power wireless multihop network architecture for the internet of things,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.57, no.7, pp.55-61, (2019)
[8] X. Liu and F. Qian, “Rethink energy accounting with cooperative game theory,” MobiCom 14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, September, pp.531-542, Maui Hawaii USA, (2014)
[9] Message Queuing Telemetry Transport, (2014)
[10] A. Pathak, Y. C. Hu, M. Zhang, P. Bahl, and Y. M. Wang, “Fine-grained power modeling for smartphones using system call tracing,” EuroSys 11: Proceedings of the sixth conference on Computer systems, April, pp.153-168, New York, United States, (2011)
[11] A. Pathak, Y. C. Hu, and Zhang. “Where is the energy spent inside my app?: fine grained energy accounting on smartphones with prof,” Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Systems, April, pp.29-42; Bern, Switzerland, (2012)
[12] S. Kim, D. Kim, H. Oh, H. Jeon, and H. Park, “The data collection solution based on MQTT for stable IoT platforms,” J. Korea Inst. Inf. Commun, Eng, vol.4, no.20, (2016)
[13] C. Berrhouma, A. Elmangoush, A. A. Hazmi, R. Steinke, and T. Magedanz, “Performance evaluation of an m2m platform in different deployment setups,” Proceedings of 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internetof-Things Design and Implementation, May 19; Berlin, Germany, (2016)