Comparing Results of Alternate Format Test Questions to Standard Multiple Choice Test Questions in First, Second and Third Year Baccalaureate Nursing Students
AUTHORS
Elizabeth Hynes, Centre for Nursing Studies, 100 Forest Road, St. John’s, NL A1A 1E5, Canada
Street Karen, Centre for Nursing Studies, 100 Forest Road, St. John’s, NL A1A 1E5, Canada
ABSTRACT
Multiple choice questions are frequently used on examinations within the health disciplines to evaluate student performance. Prior to 2015, Canadian nursing graduates were required to pass the Canadian Registered Nurse Exam (CRNE) in order to obtain licensure to practice. This exam consisted of mainly multiple choice questions. In recent years, Canada (with the exception of its province of Quebec) has adopted the NCLEX-RN exam as the licensure assessment exam for nursing graduates. The NCLEX-RN exam is a computer adaptive test that utilizes not only multiple choice questions, but also question items in a variety of other formats such as multiple response, fill-in-the-blank calculation, ordered response, and hot spot. To explore if changes in question item formats influenced an individual’s ability to answer a test question correctly, we carried out a descriptive, comparative study with first, second and third year Baccalaureate nursing students. We compared the students’ performance on NCLEX-RN style alternate format test questions with their performance on standard multiple choice questions in an anatomy and physiology course. We further compared their performance on both types of questions and their final grade in the course. A convenience sample of students enrolled in one Atlantic Canadian Nursing Program was included. Descriptive statistics resulted in significant differences between the various types of questions used. The results of this study provide the basis for recommendations directed toward inclusion of alternate format test questions on examinations throughout the current nursing curriculum as a means to enhance baccalaureate nursing students’ performance on their future licensure exam.
KEYWORDS
Nursing students, Multiple choice test questions, Alternate format test questions, NCLEX-RN exam
REFERENCES
[1] G. T. Brown and H. A. Abdulnabi, “Evaluating the quality of higher education instructor-constructed multiple-choice tests: Impact on student grades,” Frontiers in Education, vol.2, article no.24, pp.1-11, (2017)
[2] P. N. K. Lau, S. H. Lau, K. S. Hong, and H. Usop, “Guessing, partial knowledge, and misconceptions in multiple choice tests,” Educational Technology and Society, vol.14, no.4, pp.99-110, (2011)
[3] R. M. Epstein, “Assessment in medical education,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol.356, pp.387-396, (2007)
[4] M. Tarrant, A. Kneirim, S. Hayes, and J. Ware, “The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments,” Nurse Education in Practice, vol.6, pp.354-363, (2006)
[5] J. Considine and S. Thomas, “Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education,” vol.12, no.1, pp.19-24, (2005)
[6] M. G. Simkin and W. L. Kuechler, “Multiple choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection?,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol.3, no.1, pp.73-97, (2005)
[7] A. M. Brady, “Assessment of learning with multiple-choice questions,” Nurse Education in Practice, vol.5, pp.238-242, (2005)
[8] S. Birkhead, G. Kelman, B. Zittel, and L. Jatulis, “The prevalence of multiple-choice testing in registered nurse qualifying nursing education programs in New York state,” Nursing Education Perspectives, vol.39, no.3, pp.139-144, (2018)
[9] National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), “Pencils down, booklets closed,” The evolution of the NCLEX: 20 years as a computer adaptive exam, In Focus, Illinois: Author, (2014)
[10] S. Bonis, L. Tart and M. C. Wendler, “Strategies to promote success on the NCLEX-RN: An evidence-based approach using the ACE star model of knowledge transformation,” Nursing Education Perspectives, vol.28, no.2, pp.82-87, (2007)
[11] B.L. Quinn, M. Smolinski, and A. Bostain Peters, “Strategies to improve NCLEX-RN success: A review,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, vol.13, pp.18-26, (2018)
[12] D. Kappel, “NCSBN opens registration for NCLEX in Canada,” National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) News Release, (2014)
[13] National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), “2016 NCLEX-RN detailed test plan - Educator version,” [Online] Available: https://www.ncsbn.org/2016_RN_DetTestPlan_Educator.pdf, (2016)
[14] National League of Nursing (NLN), “The fair testing imperative in nursing education,” NLN Vision Series, New York: Author, (2012)
[15] A. Wendt and L. E. Kenny, “Alternate item types: Continuing the quest for authentic testing,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol.48, no.3, pp.150-156, (2009)
[16] D. F. Polit and C. T. Beck, “Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice,” 10th edition, Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, (2016)
[17] N. Thompson, “Introduction to classical test theory,” Assessment Systems Corporation Publication, (2016)
[18] M. H. Oermann and K. B. Gaberson, “Evaluation and testing in nursing education,” 4th edition, Springer Publishing Company, New York, (2014)
[19] University of Washington Office of Educational Assessment, “Understanding item analyses,” [Online] Available: www.washington.edu/assessment/scanning-scoring/reports/item-analysis
[20] T. W. McGahee and J. Ball, “How to read and really use an item analysis,” Nurse Educator, vol.34, no.4, pp.166-171, (2009)
[21] ACSP Board of Certification Research and Development Committee, “Impact of time lapse on ASCP board of certification medical laboratory scientist (MLS) and medical laboratory technician (MLT) examination scores,” Lab Medicine, vol.46, no.3, pp.e53-e58, (2015)
[22] A. Woo, A. Wendt, and W. Liu, “NCLEX pass rates: An investigation into the effects of lag time and retake attempts,” JONA’S Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation, vol.11, no.1, pp.23-26, (2009)