Hybrid Institutionas An Enabling Factor of Innovation System: A Case Study of BUM Desa “Sejahtera” Bleberan Village, Gunung Kidul
AUTHORS
Sumarjono*,Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa “APMD” Yogyakarta
Fatih Gama Abisono,Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa “APMD” Yogyakarta
Fajar Sidik,Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa “APMD” Yogyakarta
ABSTRACT
This study aims to find the institutional power of BUM Desa as a hybrid institution for the growth of innovation in local economic development in the Bleberan Village, Gunung Kidul. Previous studies of economic institutional links and innovation show that innovation factors are key to strengthening economic institutions. The difference from previous studies is that economic institutions are the determining factor in building an innovation ecosystem. The hybrid institution design inherent in BUM Desa presents several opportunities in the form of institutional excellence that can be utilized to overcome the limitations of strengthening the village economy. The findings of this study are in the case of BUM Desa “Sejahtera” the prerequisites of the hybrid institution format have not been fulfilled due to the weak capacity to institutionalize the rules of the game that bind the perpetrators and instead drag the perpetrators into involvement in conflicts that are not managed. As a result, BUM Desa “Sejahtera” failed in becoming an incubator for the growth of village innovation. Citizen innovation that initially grew did not develop because it was not well captured by BUM Desa. This study is a qualitative study using an instrumental case study method that is oriented towards enriching the theoretical treasure of economic institutions.
KEYWORDS
BUM Desa, Hybrid institution, Innovation ecosystem
REFERENCES
[1] A. Bebbington, L. Dharmawan, E. Fahmi, and S. Guggenheim, “Local Capacity, Village Governance, and the Political Economy of Rural Development in Indonesia,” World Dev., vol.34, no.11. pp.1958-1976, (2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.025.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[2] M. Sofiyanto, R. M. Mardani, and M. G. Salim, “Pengelolaan Dana Desa Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Pembangunan Di Desa Banyuates Kecamatan Banyuates Kabupaten Sampang,” J. Ris. Manaj., vol.6, no.04, (2017)
[3] F. Karimah, C. Saleh, and I. Wanusmawatie, “Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat,” J. Adm. Publik, vol.2, no.4, pp.597-602, (2014)
[4] J. A. Seitz, “The Political Economy of Creativity,” Creativity Research Journal. vol.15, no.4, pp.385-392, (2003) DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_6.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[5] D. Hastuti and N. Chilmy, “The Analysis of Local Potential in BUM Desa Empowering in Desa Lembengan, Kecamatan Ledokombo, East Java,” J. Ilmu Sos. Mamangan, vol.6, no.2, pp.85-96, (2017) DOI: 10.22202/mamangan.2357.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[6] K. Cook, Social Capital: Theory and Research. Routledge, (2017)
[7] J. Dul et al., “A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession,” Ergonomics, (2012) DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[8] N. L. L. Aziz, “The Village Autonomy and The Effectiveness of Village Fund,” J. Polit., vol.13, no.2, pp.193-211, (2016) DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol27.iss53.art12.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[9] N. Azlina, A. Hasan, Desmiyawati, and I. Muda, “The effectiveness of village fund management (case study at villages in coastal areas in Riau),” Int. J. Econ. Res., vol.14, no.12, pp.325-336, (2017)
[10] T. Muntahanah and Siti. Murdijaningsih, “Efektifitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Alokasi Dana Desa Di Kecamatan Somagede Kabupaten Banyumas,” Fak. Ekon. Univ. Wijayakusuma Purwokerto., vol 3, no.1, (2013)
[11] S. SI, “Social Media and Its Role in Marketing,” Bus. Econ. J., (2015) DOI: 10.4172/2151-6219.1000203.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[12] W. J. Cosgrove and D. P. Loucks, “Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions,” Water Resources Research. vol.51, no.6, pp.4823-4839, (2015) DOI: 10.1002/2014WR016869.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[13] M. R. R. S. Anggraeni, “Peranan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdes) Pada Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Pedesaan Studi Pada Bumdes Di Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta,” MODUS, (2016) DOI: 10.24002/modus.v28i2.848.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[14] A. Payne, D. Ballantyne, and M. Christopher, “A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy. The development and use of the ‘six markets’ model,” Eur. J. Mark., (2005) DOI: 10.1108/03090560510601806.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[15] M. Lisetchi and L. Brancu, “The Entrepreneurship Concept as a Subject of Social Innovation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol.124, no.0, pp.87-92, (2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.463.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[16] G. Hardin, “The tragedy of the commons,” Science, (1968) DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[17] E. Ostrom, “The challenge of common-pool resources,” Environment, (2008) DOI: 10.3200/ENVT.50.4.8-21.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[18] L. German and A. Keeler, “‘Hybrid institutions’: Applications of common property theory beyond discrete tenure regimes,” Int. J. Commons, vol.4, no.1, (2009) DOI: 10.18352/ijc.108.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[19] S. Raudino and S. Raudino, “The Theory of Economic Development,” in Development Aid and Sustainable Economic Growth in Africa, Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2016)
[20] OECD/Eurostat, Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th Edition), (2018)
[21] C. Moorman and G. S. Day, “Organizing for marketing excellence,” in Journal of Marketing, vol.80, no.6, pp.6-35, (2016) DOI: 10.1509/jm.15.0423.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[22] P. Baxter, Susan Jack, and S. Jack, “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers,” Qual. Rep, vol.,2008, DOI: 10.2174/1874434600802010058.(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[23] S. B. Merriam, “Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, “ John Wiley & Sons, (2009)