Effect: An Empirical Study of Social Contribution and its Management Activities

AUTHORS

Bin Jang,Doctoral Student of Graduate School of Information Systems, Pukyong National Univ. 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan, Korea
Ha-Kyun Kim,Professor (Corresponding Author) of Division of Business, Pukyong National Univ. 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu. Busan, Korea

ABSTRACT

This study are as follows: First, it has been shown that social responsibility has a significant influence on the social environment (economy, politics, society and finance). Second, the social environment in the economy, politics, and finance had a significant influence on corporate value, but the social environment in the social aspect did not have a significant influence on corporate value. This has been empirically demonstrated by this paper that social responsibility is not an investment in the vague value of the social environment on the society. Thus, an entity can enhance its value in an economy, politics and finance of social environment by routinely performing its social responsibilities on the basis of profits generated by its management activities.

 

KEYWORDS

Social responsibility, Economy, Politics, Society, Finance, Corporate value

REFERENCES

[1]     R. Hamann, “Mining Companies’ Role in Sustainable Development: the ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of Corporate Social Responsibility from a Business Perspective,” Development Southern Africa, vol.20, no.2, pp.234-145, (2003) DOI: 10.1080/03768350302957(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[2]     A. Carroll and K. M. Shabana, “The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts research and practice,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol.12, no.3, pp.85-105, (2010) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[3]     J. Choi, H. Shin and A. Nasridinove, “A comparative study on data mining classification techniques for military application,” Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, vol.7, no.2, pp.1-14, (2016)
[4]     W. C. Fredrick, “Corporate social responsibility in the Reagan era and beyond,” California Management Review, vol.25, no.3, pp.145-157, (1984) DOI: 10.2307/41165022(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[5]     M. B. Clarkson E. “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance,” Academy of Management Review, vol.20, no.1, pp.92-117, (1995) DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[6]     J. D. Westphal, “Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and performance Consequences of CEO-board Social Ties,” Academy of Management Journal, vol.42, no.1, pp.7-24, (1999) DOI: 10.5465/256871(CrossRef)(Google Scholar)
[7]     S. Vera, S. Selo and W. Widyawan, “Internet of Things (IoT) framework for granting trust among objects,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol.13, no.6, pp.1613-1627, (2017)
[8]     J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science (2nd ed.), Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, (1998)

CITATION

  • APA:
    Jang,B.& Kim,H.K.(2019). Effect: An Empirical Study of Social Contribution and its Management Activities. International Journal of Business Policy and Strategy Management, 6(1), 49-54. 10.21742/IJBPSM.2019.6.1.08
  • Harvard:
    Jang,B., Kim,H.K.(2019). "Effect: An Empirical Study of Social Contribution and its Management Activities". International Journal of Business Policy and Strategy Management, 6(1), pp.49-54. doi:10.21742/IJBPSM.2019.6.1.08
  • IEEE:
    [1] B.Jang, H.K.Kim, "Effect: An Empirical Study of Social Contribution and its Management Activities". International Journal of Business Policy and Strategy Management, vol.6, no.1, pp.49-54, Nov. 2019
  • MLA:
    Jang Bin and Kim Ha-Kyun. "Effect: An Empirical Study of Social Contribution and its Management Activities". International Journal of Business Policy and Strategy Management, vol.6, no.1, Nov. 2019, pp.49-54, doi:10.21742/IJBPSM.2019.6.1.08

ISSUE INFO

  • Volume 6, No. 1, 2019
  • ISSN(p):2206-3021
  • ISSN(e):2207-0559
  • Published:Nov. 2019

DOWNLOAD